Pike v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Pike v. State

86 N.Y.2d 811

New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 12, 1995·Published

Opinion

Motion by appellant Pike, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the denial of his motion for reargument, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion by appellant Van Amburg for leave to appeal denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant Pike, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the denial of his motion for reargument, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion by appellant Van Amburg for leave to appeal denied.

Pike v. State, 86 N.Y.2d 811 (N.Y. 1995).

Pincite

86 N.Y.2d 811 (Pike v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.