Pike v. Petro-Chem Operating, Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Pike v. Petro-Chem Operating, Co.

685 So. 2d 150, 1997 La. LEXIS 89, 1997 WL 11196

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 10, 1997

DocketNo. 97-CC-0018

StatusPublished

This text of 685 So. 2d 150 (Pike v. Petro-Chem Operating, Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pike v. Petro-Chem Operating, Co., 685 So. 2d 150, 1997 La. LEXIS 89, 1997 WL 11196 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Petro-Chem Operating Co., Inc.; Mitchell, Lane; Hock, Larry F.; Hock, Bruce; Hock, Ralph; Anderson, Gertrude Feazel; Anderson, Henry Feazel; Anderson, William Garnett; Wall, Lallage Feazel; Hugh-Rawls Corp.; Hughes, Dudley; Rawls, James; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District, Div. “I”, No. 383,422; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 28767-CW.

Denied.

MARCUS, J., would grant the writ. CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Petro-Chem Operating Co., Inc.; Mitchell, Lane; Hock, Larry F.; Hock, Bruce; Hock, Ralph; Anderson, Gertrude Feazel; Anderson, Henry Feazel; Anderson, William Garnett; Wall, Lallage Feazel; Hugh-Rawls Corp.; Hughes, Dudley; Rawls, James; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District, Div. “I”, No. 383,422; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 28767-CW.

Denied.

MARCUS, J., would grant the writ. CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

685 So. 2d 150, 1997 La. LEXIS 89, 1997 WL 11196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pike-v-petro-chem-operating-co-la-1997.