Pike v. Lowell
32 Me. 245
This text of 32 Me. 245 (Pike v. Lowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pike v. Lowell, 32 Me. 245 (Me. 1850).
Opinion
orally.—The distinction drawn by the plaintiff’s counsel cannot be sustained. There is nothing in the statute, from which it can be inferred. Limitation laws are arbitrary, but they are binding.
Judgment for defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Duff v. First Nat. Bank of Wellsville
13 F. 65 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania, 1882)
Moses v. St. Paul
67 Ala. 168 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)
Walker v. Towner
29 F. Cas. 57 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1877)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 Me. 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pike-v-lowell-me-1850.