Pike v. Bugbee
This text of 980 A.2d 912 (Pike v. Bugbee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jordan PIKE
v.
Blake BUGBEE et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Juri E. Taalman, Hartford, in support of the petition.
Peter J. Ponziani and Christopher J. Sochacki, Avon, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn.App. 820, 974 A.2d 743 (2009), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court properly granted the defendant's motion to strike the plaintiff's claims in negligence?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court properly granted the defendant's motion to strike the claim of parental liability pursuant to General Statutes § 52-572?"
PALMER and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
980 A.2d 912, 293 Conn. 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pike-v-bugbee-conn-2009.