PII Sam, LLC v. Koutsagelos
This text of 119 A.D.3d 846 (PII Sam, LLC v. Koutsagelos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Mary Koutsagelos appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), entered August 10, 2012, which denied her motion to set aside the foreclosure sale of the subject property.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
A court may exercise its inherent equitable power to ensure that a foreclosure sale conducted pursuant to a judgment of foreclosure “is not made the instrument of injustice” (Guardian Loan Co. v Early, 47 NY2d 515, 520 [1979]; see Golden Age Mtge. Corp. v Argonne Enters., LLC, 68 AD3d 925, 926 [2009]; Alkaifi v Celestial Church of Christ Calvary Parish, 24 AD3d 476, 477 [2005]) and, therefore, may set aside a foreclosure sale “ ‘where fraud, collusion, mistake, or misconduct casts suspicion on the fairness of the sale’ ” (Alkaifi v Celestial Church of Christ Calvary Parish, 24 AD3d at 477, quoting Fleet Fin. v Gillerson, 277 AD2d 279, 280 [2000]). Here, the appellant’s submissions, including her unsworn statement submitted in reply to the plaintiffs opposition to her motion to set aside the foreclosure sale, failed to cast suspicion on the fairness of the sale. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied the appellant’s motion to set aside the foreclosure sale.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 A.D.3d 846, 989 N.Y.S.2d 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pii-sam-llc-v-koutsagelos-nyappdiv-2014.