Pihakis v. Marsh
This text of 521 So. 2d 388 (Pihakis v. Marsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Despite having voluntarily dismissed the cause, counsel for appellant seeks reinstatement of the proceeding and review of the trial court's denial of his motion for continuance. Once counsel announced the voluntary dismissal on the record, objections to prior rulings were rendered moot. See Randle-Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Vasta, 360 So.2d 68 (Fla.1978); Fla. R.Civ.P. 1.420(a)(l)(i). We reject the argument that the voluntary dismissal was coerced by the trial court’s insistence that trial commence.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
521 So. 2d 388, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 692, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 974, 1988 WL 21033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pihakis-v-marsh-fladistctapp-1988.