Pigrenet v. Boland Marine
This text of 636 F.2d 1107 (Pigrenet v. Boland Marine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
636 F.2d 1107
Robert L. PIGRENET, Sr., Petitioner,
v.
BOLAND MARINE & MANUFACTURING COMPANY and The Director of
the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs of
the Department of Labor, Respondents.
No. 79-1782.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 26, 1981.
Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board (louisiana case).
Pitard, Pitard & Porobil, Michael L. Lash, New Orleans, La., for petitioner.
Stewart E. Niles, Jr., Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, New Orleans, La., for Boland Marine, etc.
Mary A. Sheehan, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Director, O. W. C. P.
(Opinion Dec. 3, 1980, 5 Cir., 631 F.2d 1190)
Before COLEMAN, Chief Judge, BROWN, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
636 F.2d 1107, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 20707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pigrenet-v-boland-marine-ca5-1981.