Pignetti, G., Pets. v. Pa. DOT
This text of Pignetti, G., Pets. v. Pa. DOT (Pignetti, G., Pets. v. Pa. DOT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
GIANNI PIGNETTI AND JENNIFER : Nos. 38 & 39 EAL 2023 PIGNETTI, : : Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court v. : : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
(1) Did the Commonwealth Court err in disregarding established precedent by adding requirements to Eminent Domain Code Section 705 that are not contained in and are contrary to the clear wording of that Section[?]
(2) Did the Commonwealth Court err in reversing the Trial Court’s application of Eminent Domain Code Section 705 when Condemnees met the clear requirements of that Statute[?]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pignetti, G., Pets. v. Pa. DOT, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pignetti-g-pets-v-pa-dot-pa-2023.