Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Co. v. Barnes

571 So. 2d 1197, 1990 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 543, 1990 WL 177716
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedNovember 14, 1990
DocketCiv. 7718
StatusPublished

This text of 571 So. 2d 1197 (Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Co. v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Co. v. Barnes, 571 So. 2d 1197, 1990 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 543, 1990 WL 177716 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

RUSSELL, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

Terrell Barnes (employee) sustained an on-the-job injury on June 25, 1987, while in the employ of Piggly Wiggly (employer). Following an ore tenus hearing, the trial court issued an order setting forth its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment in this case. Therein, it concluded that the employee was 30% permanent partially disabled as a result of the accident.

The employer appeals, contending, among other things, that the trial court erred in awarding the employee benefits without finding that he suffered a loss of ability to earn. We agree.

While the trial court’s order sets forth the amounts of the employee’s pre- and post-injury earnings, we note that such figures demonstrate that the employee has a post-injury hourly wage in excess of what he was earning prior to the accident. Nowhere in its order does the trial court make the requisite finding of loss of ability to earn. The law is clear that, where such a finding is absent from the judgment, no grounds for awarding compensation exist. Marley Erectors, Inc. v. Rice, 560 So.2d 1083 (Ala.Civ.App.1990); Alabama Power Co. v. Daniel, 545 So.2d 779 (Ala.Civ.App.1989).

Consequently, this court must reverse and remand for a determination of whether the employee suffered a loss of earning capacity. In view of the dispositive nature of this issue, we pretermit a determination of the employer’s remaining issue on appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

INGRAM, P.J., and ROBERTSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alabama Power Co. v. Daniel
545 So. 2d 779 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1989)
Marley Erectors, Inc. v. Rice
560 So. 2d 1083 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
571 So. 2d 1197, 1990 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 543, 1990 WL 177716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piggly-wiggly-alabama-distributing-co-v-barnes-alacivapp-1990.