Pigg v. State
This text of 9 Ind. 363 (Pigg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Indictment for forgery. Motion to quash overruled. What further proceedings, if any, were had, does not appear. No appeal lies except from a final judgment, in a criminal case. Farrel v. The State, 7 Ind. R. 345
The indictment in this case is drawn after the short form provided by statute. It may save the parties some trouble to say that we have decided that those forms are not in force. Whether the indictment is sufficient, independent of the statutory form, is a question not before us.
The appeal is dismissed.
See, also, Reese v. Beck, ante, 238, and cases cited in the note to that case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Ind. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pigg-v-state-ind-1857.