Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Pigg v. MASSAGEE

Pigg v. MASSAGEE

710 S.E.2d 34
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pigg v. MASSAGEE. Read the opinion of the Court — 636 N.C. 582 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 15, 2011·No. 191P09-2·Published

Opinion

710 S.E.2d 34 (2011)

Larry W. PIGG and Gloria A. Vandiver
v.
Boyd B. MASSAGEE, Jr. and Prince, Youngblood and Massagee, Partnership.

No. 191P09-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 15, 2011.

Larry W. Pigg, for Pigg, Larry W. et al.

Ervin L. Ball, Jr., Asheville, for Massagee, et al.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 28th of January 2011 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of June 2011."

JACKSON, J. recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pigg v. MASSAGEE, 710 S.E.2d 34 (N.C. 2011).

710 S.E.2d 34 (Pigg v. MASSAGEE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.