Piganelli v. Reichard

Sixth Circuit

Piganelli v. Reichard

123 F.2d 957, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2856

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 12, 1941

DocketNo. 9094

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 F.2d 957 (Piganelli v. Reichard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Piganelli v. Reichard, 123 F.2d 957, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2856 (6th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion filed by the United States Attorney on behalf of the appellee to dismiss the appeal because not taken within three months after the entry of the judgment in the District Court, 28 U.S.C.A. § 230, and for failure to comply with Rule 73(g) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and no response thereto having been received from counsel for the appellant.

It is Ordered That the motion be granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed with costs to the appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion filed by the United States Attorney on behalf of the appellee to dismiss the appeal because not taken within three months after the entry of the judgment in the District Court, 28 U.S.C.A. § 230, and for failure to comply with Rule 73(g) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and no response thereto having been received from counsel for the appellant.

It is Ordered That the motion be granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed with costs to the appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 F.2d 957, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piganelli-v-reichard-ca6-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack