Piganelli v. Reichard

123 F.2d 957, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2856
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided November 12, 1941·No. No. 9094·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion filed by the United States Attorney on behalf of the appellee to dismiss the appeal because not taken within three months after the entry of the judgment in the District Court, 28 U.S.C.A. § 230, and for failure to comply with Rule 73(g) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and no response thereto having been received from counsel for the appellant.

It is Ordered That the motion be granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed with costs to the appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Piganelli v. Reichard, 123 F.2d 957, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2856 (6th Cir. 1941).

123 F.2d 957 (Piganelli v. Reichard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Healy Corp.
359 N.E.2d 634 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1977)