Pifer v. Pifer
270 So. 2d 43, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5716
Opinion
The amount ordered for support of these parties’ five children is not unreasonable, [44] but the award of attorney’s fees is predicated upon evidence which clearly takes into account work done by appellee’s lawyers on matters unrelated to the present case, and 'should be reconsidered by the trial judge. See Scanlon v. Scanlon, Fla.App. 1st 1963, 154 So.2d 899.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pifer v. Pifer, 270 So. 2d 43, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5716 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
270 So. 2d 43 (Pifer v. Pifer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scanlon v. Scanlon
154 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)