Pietton v. Evertz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pietton v. Evertz

100 So. 3d 229, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18880, 2012 WL 5349707

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 2012

DocketNo. 3D11-3271

StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 3d 229 (Pietton v. Evertz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pietton v. Evertz, 100 So. 3d 229, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18880, 2012 WL 5349707 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon appellee Yamila Evertz, etc.’s consent to all of the relief requested by the appellants, Denis Pietton, etc., et al., we reverse the order on petitioner’s ex [230]*230parte “Motion for Order Approving Settlement and to Enjoin One of the Potential Beneficiaries from Interfering with the Administration of [the] Probate [Estate] and from Taking Action Contrary to the Personal Representative’s Authority,” and remand for a proper hearing on Evertz’s motion.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based upon appellee Yamila Evertz, etc.’s consent to all of the relief requested by the appellants, Denis Pietton, etc., et al., we reverse the order on petitioner’s ex [230]*230parte “Motion for Order Approving Settlement and to Enjoin One of the Potential Beneficiaries from Interfering with the Administration of [the] Probate [Estate] and from Taking Action Contrary to the Personal Representative’s Authority,” and remand for a proper hearing on Evertz’s motion.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 So. 3d 229, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18880, 2012 WL 5349707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pietton-v-evertz-fladistctapp-2012.