Piett v. Pittsburg Contracting Co.
This text of 171 A.D. 938 (Piett v. Pittsburg Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence clearly shows that the defendant Mitchell was not acting in the course of his employment, or within the scope of his authority, in assaulting the plaintiff. There is nothing in the testimony that would make the defendant corporation liable for the assaults of Mitchell; and for that reason the finding that Mitchell was acting within the scope of his authority and that the defendant appellant was liable for Mitchell’s assaults is reversed, the judgment reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Smith, JJ. Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 A.D. 938, 156 N.Y.S. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piett-v-pittsburg-contracting-co-nyappdiv-1915.