Pietro Mario Pugliano v. Paul Staziak, Peter Pollice, Leonard Monti, Enoc N. Johnson, Thomas Welsh, Vincent Tambura, Rita Henderson and Marion Sarnic
This text of 345 F.2d 797 (Pietro Mario Pugliano v. Paul Staziak, Peter Pollice, Leonard Monti, Enoc N. Johnson, Thomas Welsh, Vincent Tambura, Rita Henderson and Marion Sarnic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
345 F.2d 797
Pietro Mario PUGLIANO, Appellant,
v.
Paul STAZIAK, Peter Pollice, Leonard Monti, Enoc N. Johnson, Thomas Welsh, Vincent Tambura, Rita Henderson and Marion Sarnic.
No. 15029.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Submitted May 21, 1965.
Decided June 10, 1965.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Rabe Ferguson Marsh, Jr., Judge.
Pietro Mario Pugliano, pro se.
David W. Craig, City Sol., City of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Robert E. Dauer, Asst. City Sol., City of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellees Staziak, Pollice, Monti and Johnson.
Richard C. Witt, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee Welsh.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and STALEY and GANEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We can perceive no error in the disposition of this case. Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed, D.C., 231 F.Supp. 347.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
345 F.2d 797, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pietro-mario-pugliano-v-paul-staziak-peter-pollice-leonard-monti-enoc-ca3-1965.