Pietrantoni v. Pietrantoni

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pietrantoni v. Pietrantoni

4 A.D.3d 742, 771 N.Y.S.2d 477, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1415

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 A.D.3d 742 (Pietrantoni v. Pietrantoni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pietrantoni v. Pietrantoni, 4 A.D.3d 742, 771 N.Y.S.2d 477, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1415 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Robert J. Lunn, J.), entered September 4, 2002. The order granted plaintiffs motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issue of liability and for a new trial on the issue of damages only in a personal injury action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the verdict is reinstated.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order granting plaintiffs motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issue of liability and for a new trial on the issue of damages only. The evidence at trial establishes that defendant was driving well under the posted speed limit and that the roads were icy and snow-covered. It was an issue of fact whether defendant was driving too fast for the conditions (see Vadala v Carroll, 91 AD2d 865 [1982], affd 59 NY2d 751 [1983]). Consequently, we reverse the order, deny the motion and reinstate the verdict. Present—Green, J.P, Scudder, Gorski, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Robert J. Lunn, J.), entered September 4, 2002. The order granted plaintiffs motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issue of liability and for a new trial on the issue of damages only in a personal injury action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the verdict is reinstated.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order granting plaintiffs motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issue of liability and for a new trial on the issue of damages only. The evidence at trial establishes that defendant was driving well under the posted speed limit and that the roads were icy and snow-covered. It was an issue of fact whether defendant was driving too fast for the conditions (see Vadala v Carroll, 91 AD2d 865 [1982], affd 59 NY2d 751 [1983]). Consequently, we reverse the order, deny the motion and reinstate the verdict. Present—Green, J.P, Scudder, Gorski, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.3d 742, 771 N.Y.S.2d 477, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pietrantoni-v-pietrantoni-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack