Pietranico v. Ambach
This text of 432 N.E.2d 796 (Pietranico v. Ambach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Leonard A. Weiss at the Appellate Division (82 AD2d 625), based on the bare record before us.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Judges Fuchsberg and Meyer [863]*863dissent in part and vote to modify by reducing the punishment imposed to censure for the reasons stated in the concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion by former Justice J. Clarence Herlihy at the Appellate Division (82 AD2d 625, 627-628).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
432 N.E.2d 796, 55 N.Y.2d 861, 447 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pietranico-v-ambach-ny-1982.