Pieser v. Bakery
753 N.W.2d 186
This text of 753 N.W.2d 186 (Pieser v. Bakery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pieser v. Bakery, 753 N.W.2d 186 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Richard L. PIESER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SARA LEE BAKERY and Travelers Property Casualty Company, Defendants-Appellants, and
Second Injury Fund, Vocationally Handicapped Provisions, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
753 N.W.2d 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pieser-v-bakery-mich-2008.