Pierson v. Watters
7 Ill. App. 400, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 240
Opinion
In this record there is no bill of exceptions signed and sealed by the judge who tried the cause, and no suggestion of a diminution of the record having been made, the presumption is that the original bill of exceptions was not signed. Miller v. Jenkins, 44 Ill. 443.
In such case we cannot consider what is copied into the the record as a bill of exceptions to be any part of the record. Reeves v. Reeves, 54 Ill. 332.
. The judgment will be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierson v. Watters, 7 Ill. App. 400, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 240 (Ill. Ct. App. 1880).
7 Ill. App. 400 (Pierson v. Watters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Benham
25 Ill. App. 248 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1888)