Pierson v. Watters

7 Ill. App. 400, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 240
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedDecember 4, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 Ill. App. 400 (Pierson v. Watters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierson v. Watters, 7 Ill. App. 400, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 240 (Ill. Ct. App. 1880).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this record there is no bill of exceptions signed and sealed by the judge who tried the cause, and no suggestion of a diminution of the record having been made, the presumption is that the original bill of exceptions was not signed. Miller v. Jenkins, 44 Ill. 443.

In such case we cannot consider what is copied into the the record as a bill of exceptions to be any part of the record. Reeves v. Reeves, 54 Ill. 332.

. The judgment will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Benham
25 Ill. App. 248 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Ill. App. 400, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierson-v-watters-illappct-1880.