Pierson v. State
This text of 449 S.W.2d 248 (Pierson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The offense is driving while intoxicated, a second offender; the punishment, three (3) years.
The sole question presented in the briefs filed in the trial court relates to the admissibility of evidence relating to a prior conviction for driving while intoxicated, a subsequent offender, at the hearing on punishment. The contention is made without citation of authority or reasons stated that the judgment was void.
The State’s brief points out that such exhibit was admitted without objection, and cites Fuller v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 867, as authority for the admissibility of such exhibit, and we agree.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
449 S.W.2d 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierson-v-state-texcrimapp-1970.