Pierson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pierson v. State

460 S.W.3d 481, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 365, 2015 WL 1548869

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 2015·No. No. ED 101320·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Christopher Pierson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. The judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Christopher Pierson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. The judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Pierson v. State, 460 S.W.3d 481, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 365, 2015 WL 1548869 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

460 S.W.3d 481 (Pierson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.