Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pierson v. State

Pierson v. State

801 So. 2d 1055, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18246, 2001 WL 1646964
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 26, 2001
DocketNo. 1D01-1114
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 801 So. 2d 1055 (Pierson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierson v. State, 801 So. 2d 1055, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18246, 2001 WL 1646964 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order denying his motion seeking prison credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the appellant’s allegations that he was not awarded credit for the initial time served on the incarcerative portion of his “split sentence,” or to grant the requested relief. See Robinson v. State, 786 So.2d 651 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Layman v. State, 787 So.2d 44 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

MINER, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. State
77 So. 3d 710 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Yarbrough v. State
926 So. 2d 448 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Shuler v. State
801 So. 2d 1055 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
801 So. 2d 1055, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18246, 2001 WL 1646964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierson-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.