Pierson v. State
801 So. 2d 1055, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18246, 2001 WL 1646964
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 2001·No. No. 1D01-1114·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The appellant challenges an order denying his motion seeking prison credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the appellant’s allegations that he was not awarded credit for the initial time served on the incarcerative portion of his “split sentence,” or to grant the requested relief. See Robinson v. State, 786 So.2d 651 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Layman v. State, 787 So.2d 44 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierson v. State, 801 So. 2d 1055, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18246, 2001 WL 1646964 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
801 So. 2d 1055 (Pierson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. State
77 So. 3d 710 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Yarbrough v. State
926 So. 2d 448 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Shuler v. State
801 So. 2d 1055 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)