Pierson v. Pierson
181 A. 25, 119 N.J. Eq. 19, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 585
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Herr in the court of chancery.
For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 14.
For reversa l—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierson v. Pierson, 181 A. 25, 119 N.J. Eq. 19, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 585 (N.J. 1935).
181 A. 25 (Pierson v. Pierson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jacobs v. Jacobs
263 A.2d 155 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Lysick v. Lysick
220 A.2d 702 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
Kershner v. Kershner
121 A.2d 775 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Crowell v. Crowell
110 A.2d 57 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)