Pierson v. Miles
12 Wend. 221
Opinion
[222] By the Court,
The firm having no agent at Geneva, the defendants were not bound to serve the notice of retainer on the agent of one of the firm; and the notice having been duly posted, previous to the entry of the default, the default was irregularly entered, and must be set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierson v. Miles, 12 Wend. 221 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).
12 Wend. 221 (Pierson v. Miles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Arms v. Austin
43 Barb. 313 (New York Supreme Court, 1863)