Piersma v. Seitz

276 A.2d 666, 262 Md. 61
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 10, 1971
Docket[No. 477, September Term, 1970.]
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 A.2d 666 (Piersma v. Seitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Piersma v. Seitz, 276 A.2d 666, 262 Md. 61 (Md. 1971).

Opinion

262 Md. 61 (1971)
276 A.2d 666

PIERSMA
v.
SEITZ BEALL
v.
DANIELS

[No. 477, September Term, 1970.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 10, 1971.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

Martin H. Freeman, with whom were Sasscer, Clagett, Powers & Channing on the brief, for Priscilla R. *62 Piersma, appellant. Frank B. Haskell, III, with whom were Mitchell, Clagett & Haskell on the brief, for David R. Beall, other appellant.

Townes L. Dawson for William L. Seitz, appellee and submitted on brief by Russell W. Shipley and Kahler, Shipley & O'Malley for Judith G. Daniels, other appellee.

PER CURIAM:

This Court adopts the opinion of Chief Judge Murphy in Piersma v. Seitz, 10 Md. App. 439, and therefore affirms the judgments appealed from.

Judgments affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Green
415 A.2d 1131 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 A.2d 666, 262 Md. 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piersma-v-seitz-md-1971.