Piersma v. Seitz

276 A.2d 666, 262 Md. 61
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 10, 1971·No. [No. 477, September Term, 1970.]·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

262 Md. 61 (1971)
276 A.2d 666

PIERSMA
v.
SEITZ BEALL
v.
DANIELS

[No. 477, September Term, 1970.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 10, 1971.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

Martin H. Freeman, with whom were Sasscer, Clagett, Powers & Channing on the brief, for Priscilla R. *62 Piersma, appellant. Frank B. Haskell, III, with whom were Mitchell, Clagett & Haskell on the brief, for David R. Beall, other appellant.

Townes L. Dawson for William L. Seitz, appellee and submitted on brief by Russell W. Shipley and Kahler, Shipley & O'Malley for Judith G. Daniels, other appellee.

PER CURIAM:

This Court adopts the opinion of Chief Judge Murphy in Piersma v. Seitz, 10 Md. App. 439, and therefore affirms the judgments appealed from.

Judgments affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Piersma v. Seitz, 276 A.2d 666, 262 Md. 61 (Md. 1971).

276 A.2d 666 (Piersma v. Seitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. Green
415 A.2d 1131 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1980)