Piersma v. Henderson

60 A.D.2d 1001, 401 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10085
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 20, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 60 A.D.2d 1001 (Piersma v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Piersma v. Henderson, 60 A.D.2d 1001, 401 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10085 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed and petition granted to the extent of dismissing parole detainer warrant. Memorandum: Petitioner, an inmate at a State correctional facility, appeals from a judgment dismissing his application for a writ of habeas corpus, which we now convert to an article 78 proceeding. On May 1, 1947 petitioner was sentenced to an indeterminate term of 20 to 40 years upon his conviction of arson, first degree. On October 14, 1971 he was released on parole and, while still under parole supervision, he was arrested on March 26, 1974 and charged with sexual abuse, first degree. A parole detainer warrant was lodged against him on March 27, 1974. Upon his plea of guilty to sexual abuse, first degree, he was sentenced on February 13, 1975 to an indetermi[1002]*1002nate term of two to four years to run concurrently with the time remaining on his 1947 sentence. Petitioner has been incarcerated since his arrest in March, 1974. He was not afforded a parole revocation hearing until October 13, 1977. A delay of more than 41 months in granting petitioner his final parole revocation hearing is prejudicial and a denial of his constitutional rights (Morrissey v Brewer, 408 US 471). In such circumstances the parole detainer warrant must be dismissed with prejudice and upon the expiration of the sentence imposed on February 13, 1975 he will be entitled to be released to parole status (Matter of Smith v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 AD2d 775). (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Supreme Court—art 78.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF SPARAGO v. New York State Bd. of Parole
524 N.E.2d 138 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People ex rel. Brown v. New York State Division of Parole
516 N.E.2d 194 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People ex rel. Maiello v. New York State Board of Parole
101 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Goodwin v. Hammock
502 F. Supp. 756 (S.D. New York, 1981)
People ex rel. Landy v. New York State Division of Parole
75 A.D.2d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
People ex rel. Levy v. Dalsheim
66 A.D.2d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hernadandez v. Hammock
63 A.D.2d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A.D.2d 1001, 401 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piersma-v-henderson-nyappdiv-1978.