Home/New York Court of Appeals/Piersma v. Henderson

Piersma v. Henderson

44 N.Y. 982
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 6, 1978
StatusPublished

This text of 44 N.Y. 982 (Piersma v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Piersma v. Henderson, 44 N.Y. 982 (N.Y. 1978).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, in each case.

The parole detainer warrants were properly dismissed. (People ex rel. Walsh v Vincent, 40 NY2d 1049; Matter of Beattie v New York State Bd. of Parole, 39 NY2d 445.) It is of no significance for present purposes that the parolees in these cases were being held on new commitments rather than only on new arrest charges.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum; Judges Jasen and Cooke concur on constraint of People ex rel. Walsh v Vincent (40 NY2d 1049).

In each case: Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beattie v. New York State Board
348 N.E.2d 873 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People ex rel. Walsh v. Vincent
360 N.E.2d 919 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 N.Y. 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piersma-v-henderson-ny-1978.