Piersa v. Phoenix Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Piersa v. Phoenix Insurance

269 Conn. 915

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Piersa v. Phoenix Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 273 Conn. 519 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 9, 2004·No. SC 17206·Published

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 752 (AC 24188), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a self-insured municipal employer may reduce the limits of its uninsured motorist coverage by the amount of [916]*916compensation benefits paid without reducing it to writing?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17206. Decided June 9, 2004 Jon Berk, in support of the petition. William J. Melley III, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 752 (AC 24188), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a self-insured municipal employer may reduce the limits of its uninsured motorist coverage by the amount of [916]*916compensation benefits paid without reducing it to writing?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17206. Decided June 9, 2004 Jon Berk, in support of the petition. William J. Melley III, in opposition.

Piersa v. Phoenix Insurance, 269 Conn. 915 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

269 Conn. 915 (Piersa v. Phoenix Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related