Pierremari v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pierremari v. State

564 So. 2d 633, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5683, 1990 WL 108843

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 2, 1990

DocketNo. 90-107

StatusPublished

This text of 564 So. 2d 633 (Pierremari v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pierremari v. State, 564 So. 2d 633, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5683, 1990 WL 108843 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

W. SHARP, Judge.

We affirm Pierremari’s conviction and sentence for trafficking in cocaine in the amount of 400 grams or more, a violation of section 893.135(l)(b)3 and section 893.-03(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). We remand solely to permit the trial court to correct apparent errors in the judgment appealed: the criminal offense for which Pierremari was convicted is a first degree felony (not a second degree felony); and the lien for service of the defendant’s appointed counsel was $250.00 (not $350.00).

AFFIRM; REMAND.

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. SHARP, Judge.

We affirm Pierremari’s conviction and sentence for trafficking in cocaine in the amount of 400 grams or more, a violation of section 893.135(l)(b)3 and section 893.-03(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). We remand solely to permit the trial court to correct apparent errors in the judgment appealed: the criminal offense for which Pierremari was convicted is a first degree felony (not a second degree felony); and the lien for service of the defendant’s appointed counsel was $250.00 (not $350.00).

AFFIRM; REMAND.

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 So. 2d 633, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5683, 1990 WL 108843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierremari-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.