Pierrelouis v. Pierrelouis

272 So. 3d 1291
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 2019·No. Case No. 2D18-4652·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed. See Grasso v. Grasso, 113 So. 3d 855, 856 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) ("To the extent that the order on appeal addresses the issue of subject matter jurisdiction, it is not an appealable, nonfinal order."); Brulte v. Brulte, 967 So. 2d 1087, 1088 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) ("[c]oncluding that the order on appeal does not fall into any of the categories of appealable orders identified in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130" where the nonfinal order "dealt with subject matter jurisdiction" under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act).

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierrelouis v. Pierrelouis, 272 So. 3d 1291 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

272 So. 3d 1291 (Pierrelouis v. Pierrelouis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brulte v. Brulte
967 So. 2d 1087 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Grasso v. Grasso
113 So. 3d 855 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)