Pierre Watson v. Zachary Driskill
This text of Pierre Watson v. Zachary Driskill (Pierre Watson v. Zachary Driskill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-1673 ___________________________
Pierre Watson
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Officer Zachary Driskill, Individual capacity; Jessica Hanner, Sgt., Individually
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
Diane Manley, Corporal, Individually; Kevin Brown, Correctional Officer, Individually; John Hendrichs, Correctional Officer, Individually; Matthew Unknown, Correctional Officer, Individually; Tammy Unknown, Sick Call Nurse, Individually; Institution Doctor Unknown, Individually; Michelle Unknown; Unknown Fulh
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants ___________________________
No. 22-2378 ___________________________
Officer Zachary Driskill, Individual capacity; Jessica Hanner, Sgt., Individually
llllllllllllllllll llDefendants - Appellees Diane Manley, Corporal, Individually; Kevin Brown, Correctional Officer, Individually; John Hendrichs, Correctional Officer, Individually; Matthew Unknown, Correctional Officer, Individually; Tammy Unknown, Sick Call Nurse, Individually; Institution Doctor Unknown, Individually; Michelle Unknown; Unknown Fulh
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants ____________
Appeals from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________
Submitted: January 19, 2023 Filed: February 3, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, MELLOY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Pierre Watson appeals the district court’s 1 refusal to reconsider its grant of summary judgment to the corrections officers who allegedly failed to protect him from another inmate. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion in denying his motions to set aside the judgment and compel discovery. See Freeman v. Wyeth, 764 F.3d 806, 809 (8th Cir. 2014); Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) (requiring a party seeking an order compelling discovery to first make “an effort to obtain it without court action”). Also absent is any evidence of judicial bias. See Liteky v. United States,
1 The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pierre Watson v. Zachary Driskill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierre-watson-v-zachary-driskill-ca8-2023.