Pierre v. Yon Song

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pierre v. Yon Song

278 A.D.2d 466, 717 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13865

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 26, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 466 (Pierre v. Yon Song) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pierre v. Yon Song, 278 A.D.2d 466, 717 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme [467]*467Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated February 16, 2000, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction based on improper service.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff an extension of time to serve the summons and complaint upon the defendant (see, CPLR 306-b; Alberti v Dunn Eng’g Assocs., 267 AD2d 264). Sullivan, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme [467]*467Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated February 16, 2000, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction based on improper service.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff an extension of time to serve the summons and complaint upon the defendant (see, CPLR 306-b; Alberti v Dunn Eng’g Assocs., 267 AD2d 264). Sullivan, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 466, 717 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierre-v-yon-song-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack