Pierre v. Watson
This text of Pierre v. Watson (Pierre v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Patricia Watson, Respondent.
Jean-Gespere Pierre, appellant pro se. Patricia Watson, respondent pro se (no brief filed).
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Odessa Kennedy, J.), entered February 7, 2018. The order denied plaintiff's motion, in effect, to vacate a judgment of that court (Mary V. Rosado, J.) entered December 18, 2017, after an inquest, dismissing the action.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs, plaintiff's motion, in effect, to vacate the judgment entered December 18, 2017 is granted and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new inquest.
In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover the principal sum of $4,000, based on damage to, and loss of, property. After defendant failed to appear, an inquest was held, following which judgment was entered dismissing the action. Plaintiff moved, in effect, to vacate the judgment. By order entered February 7, 2018, the Civil Court denied plaintiff's motion.
There is no record of the testimony given at the inquest. Since the incomplete state of the record precludes any effective appellate review of the matter, a new inquest must be held (see Murphy v Murphy, 144 AD2d 904 [1988]; Hynard v Apt., Inc., 2001 NY Slip Op 40561[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2001]; see also Kaya v Floyd, 41 Misc 3d 127[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 51644[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2013]; Schillingford v Saxe, 38 Misc 3d 144[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 50266[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2013]; Scheinfeld v Platt, 5 Misc 3d 132[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51422[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2004]).
Accordingly, the order is reversed, plaintiff's motion, in effect, to vacate the judgment entered December 18, 2017 is granted and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new inquest.
WESTON, J.P., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: August 16, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pierre v. Watson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierre-v-watson-nyappterm-2019.