Pierre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pierre v. State

844 So. 2d 658, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3124, 2003 WL 1037043

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 2003·No. No. 3D01-2762·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric Pierre appeals his convictions for armed robbery and armed sexual battery.

We conclude that the trial court’s denial of the defendant-appellant’s motion to suppress evidence is supported by the record. “[A] trial court’s ruling on the voluntariness of a confession will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.” Chambers v. State, 742 So.2d 466, 468 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Regarding closing arguments, we conclude that the trial court’s rulings were within its discretion. “[T]he trial court’s ruling on these matters will not be overturned unless a clear abuse of discretion is shown.” Hooper v. State, 476 So.2d 1253, 1257 (Fla.1985) (citations omitted).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Eric Pierre appeals his convictions for armed robbery and armed sexual battery.

We conclude that the trial court’s denial of the defendant-appellant’s motion to suppress evidence is supported by the record. “[A] trial court’s ruling on the voluntariness of a confession will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.” Chambers v. State, 742 So.2d 466, 468 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Regarding closing arguments, we conclude that the trial court’s rulings were within its discretion. “[T]he trial court’s ruling on these matters will not be overturned unless a clear abuse of discretion is shown.” Hooper v. State, 476 So.2d 1253, 1257 (Fla.1985) (citations omitted).

Affirmed.

Pierre v. State, 844 So. 2d 658, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3124, 2003 WL 1037043 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

844 So. 2d 658 (Pierre v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related