Pierre v. State
785 So. 2d 686, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6642, 2001 WL 514278
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pierre v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 732 So. 2d 376 →
Opinion
Because the record now before us does not conclusively refute the claim set forth in the “addendum” to the appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, we reverse that part of the trial court order which denies relief on that issue and remand for a hearing, or for the court to attach record excerpts conclusively refuting the appellant’s claim. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). We affirm the denial of relief on the remaining issues.
[687]*687Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierre v. State, 785 So. 2d 686, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6642, 2001 WL 514278 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
785 So. 2d 686 (Pierre v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.