Pierre v. State

718 So. 2d 884, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11422, 1998 WL 567877
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pierre v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 732 So. 2d 376
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 1998·No. No. 97-1084·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Nelms v. State, 596 So.2d 441 (Fla.1992); Villavicencio v. State, 719 So.2d 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Lanier v. State, 709 So.2d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Cf. Rhue v. State, 693 So.2d 567 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Norris v. State, 525 So.2d 998 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierre v. State, 718 So. 2d 884, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11422, 1998 WL 567877 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

718 So. 2d 884 (Pierre v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Rhue v. State
693 So. 2d 567 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Lanier v. State
709 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Villavicencio v. State
719 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Nelms v. State
596 So. 2d 441 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Norris v. State
525 So. 2d 998 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)