Pierre v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

583 F. App'x 271
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 29, 2014
DocketNo. 14-1338
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 583 F. App'x 271 (Pierre v. Federal Bureau of Investigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierre v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 583 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pascal Andre Pierre Etcheber appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Etcheber v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, No. 2:13-cv-00752-JFA, 2014 WL 1319145 (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coffy v. Dittrich
D. South Carolina, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
583 F. App'x 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierre-v-federal-bureau-of-investigation-ca4-2014.