Pierre-Louis v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
This text of 72 A.D.3d 463 (Pierre-Louis v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered on or about October 10, 2008, which, in an action alleging medical malpractice, granted petitioners’ motion for leave to file a late notice of claim, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied.
Petitioners failed to demonstrate that respondent had actual notice of the facts constituting the claim and would not be prejudiced by the delay (see Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 6 NY3d 531 [2006]). Respondent’s mere possession of medi[464]*464cal records does not demonstrate that it has actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim, as the medical records, on their face, indicate that infant petitioner underwent a routine circumcision without complications, and do not evince any malpractice (id. at 537; see Webb v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 50 AD3d 265 [2008]). Petitioners also failed to offer a reasonable excuse for the delay of more than one year in seeking leave to file a late notice of claim. Petitioner mother did not state when she became aware of the alleged malpractice, nor is there any indication that the delay was a result of the infancy (see Matter of Nieves v New York Health & Hosps. Corp., 34 AD3d 336, 337 [2006]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 A.D.3d 463, 899 N.Y.S.2d 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierre-louis-v-new-york-city-health-hospitals-corp-nyappdiv-2010.