Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Piermatteo v. Debell

Piermatteo v. Debell

999 So. 2d 659, 2009 WL 130818
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 21, 2009
Docket4D07-3887, 4D07-4401
StatusPublished

This text of 999 So. 2d 659 (Piermatteo v. Debell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Piermatteo v. Debell, 999 So. 2d 659, 2009 WL 130818 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ROBERT PIERMATTEO and TARA PIERMATTEO, his wife, Appellants,
v.
LEE EDWARD DEBELL and CYPRESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

Nos. 4D07-3887, 4D07-4401

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 21, 2009.

Roger N. Messer of Messer and Messer, Port St. Lucie, Andrew A. Harris and Philip M. Burlington of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Neil Rose and Seth M. Loft of Bernstein, Chackman, Liss & Rose, Hollywood, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, C.J., FARMER and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 So. 2d 659, 2009 WL 130818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piermatteo-v-debell-fladistctapp-2009.