Pierce, Wulbern, Murphey, Inc. v. Consurgico Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pierce, Wulbern, Murphey, Inc. v. Consurgico Corp.

343 So. 2d 1353, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15582

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 1, 1977

DocketNo. DD-44

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 343 So. 2d 1353 (Pierce, Wulbern, Murphey, Inc. v. Consurgico Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pierce, Wulbern, Murphey, Inc. v. Consurgico Corp., 343 So. 2d 1353, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15582 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal from a summary final judgment in favor of the defendant there. The learned trial judge wrote an extensive explanatory summary final judgment which recites the uncontroverted facts and reasons for his conclusion that a summary judgment was required. Nothing will be added to the jurisprudence of Florida by repetition here.

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal from a summary final judgment in favor of the defendant there. The learned trial judge wrote an extensive explanatory summary final judgment which recites the uncontroverted facts and reasons for his conclusion that a summary judgment was required. Nothing will be added to the jurisprudence of Florida by repetition here.

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

343 So. 2d 1353, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-wulbern-murphey-inc-v-consurgico-corp-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack