Pierce v. United States
This text of Pierce v. United States (Pierce v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-5150
DANIEL D. PIERCE and HENDY J. LUND,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee.
Brian G. Isaacson, Isaacson & Wilson, P.S., of Seattle, Washington, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.
Marion E.M. Erickson, Attorney, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Richard T. Morrison, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Richard Farber, Attorney. Of counsel was Randolph L. Hutter, Attorney
Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims
Judge Susan G. Braden NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
DANIEL D. PIERCE, and HENDY J. LUND,
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Federal Claims
in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-1071
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (LINN, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and PROST, Circuit Judge ).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED April 14, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly___________________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pierce v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-united-states-cafc-2008.