Pierce v. United States
260 F. 158, 171 C.C.A. 194, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2052
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pierce v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 F. 514 →
Opinion
It is urged that the trial court erred in the matter of interest included in the judgment under review. As this question was not raised by the assignments of error and briefs at the hearing, we do not think it should be considered now. The other matters in the petition for rehearing were fully considered, and we see no reason for changing the conclusion.
The petition is denied.
adheres to the views expressed in his dis* senting opinion previously filed. 257 Fed. 518, — C. C. A. -.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierce v. United States, 260 F. 158, 171 C.C.A. 194, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2052 (8th Cir. 1919).
260 F. 158 (Pierce v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pierce v. United States
257 F. 514 (Eighth Circuit, 1919)