Pierce v. Thomas
This text of 369 S.E.2d 742 (Pierce v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rozier deeded real property to Thomas in 1967. Thomas built a house on the property, where she has resided ever since. In 1981, Rozier deeded the same property to Pierce, reserving to herself a life estate. Pierce recorded this deed in 1981, and Rozier died later in that same year. Thomas did not record her deeds until 1986. Based on these undisputed circumstances, the trial court granted summary judgment to Thomas.
“Possession of land is notice to the world of whatever right or title the occupant has.” Broome v. Davis, 87 Ga. 584, 587 (13 SE 749) (1891).1 This principle was codified as Georgia Code of 1895, § 3931, as follows: “Possession of land is notice of whatever right or title the occupant has.” It now appears as OCGA § 44-5-169: “Possession of land shall constitute notice of the rights or title of the occupant.”
The grant of summary judgment was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
369 S.E.2d 742, 258 Ga. 469, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-thomas-ga-1988.