Pierce v. Stuart

California Supreme Court

Pierce v. Stuart

45 Cal. 280

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1873

DocketNo. 3,536

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 45 Cal. 280 (Pierce v. Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pierce v. Stuart, 45 Cal. 280 (Cal. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

The findings show that the grantor of the plaintiff’s intestate had the actual possession of the premises in controversy, and, whilst so in possession, sold and conveyed the same to said intestate, who thereafter, and up to the time of the entry of defendants, occupied the same as pasturage for his cattle. The defendants show no title or right of entry. There was sufficient proof to sustain the findings, and we discover no error in the rulings of the Court during the progress of the trial.

Order denying motion for a new trial affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

The findings show that the grantor of the plaintiff’s intestate had the actual possession of the premises in controversy, and, whilst so in possession, sold and conveyed the same to said intestate, who thereafter, and up to the time of the entry of defendants, occupied the same as pasturage for his cattle. The defendants show no title or right of entry. There was sufficient proof to sustain the findings, and we discover no error in the rulings of the Court during the progress of the trial.

Order denying motion for a new trial affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Cal. 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-stuart-cal-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack