Pierce v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Pierce v. State

270 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 615, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 279

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pierce v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 106 Tex. Crim. 116 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 25, 1925·No. No. 8743.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor is the offense; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.

A plea of guilty was entered. The judgment recites that evidence was heard and the verdict regularly rendered. There is an absence *648 of a statement of facts and bills of exception. No fault in the trial has been observed in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor is the offense; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.

A plea of guilty was entered. The judgment recites that evidence was heard and the verdict regularly rendered. There is an absence *648 of a statement of facts and bills of exception. No fault in the trial has been observed in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Pierce v. State, 270 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 615, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 279 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

270 S.W. 1118 (Pierce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.