Pierce v. State

1953 OK CR 182, 265 P.2d 737, 97 Okla. Crim. 402, 1953 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 342
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided December 30, 1953·No. No. A-11885·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

POWELL, P. J.

Priscilla Pierce was charged in the county court of Kay county with the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, with the intent to sell the same. The jury found her guilty and fixed the penalty at a fine of $200, and 30 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

Counsel for the accused have long been in default for a brief, and no one appeared to represent the defendant when the ease was set down for oral argument.

We have carefully examined the record. The evidence by the officers is overwhelming that the liquor found in the accused’s bedroom belonged to her by her own admissions. This appears to have been her first offense. The accused testified and denied owning the liquor. There was some evidence that the husband had left the accused and her three minor children, though there was no divorce.

We have decided that justice would best be served by reason of the evidence as a whole, by reducing the fine from $200 to $100, and the verdict and judgment as thus reduced to a fine of $100 and 30 days’ imprisonment in the county jail is affirmed.

JONES and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierce v. State, 1953 OK CR 182, 265 P.2d 737, 97 Okla. Crim. 402, 1953 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 342 (Okla. Ct. App. 1953).

1953 OK CR 182 (Pierce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Childs v. State
1959 OK CR 40 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1959)
Hastings v. State
1957 OK CR 96 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1957)