Pierce v. State
553 S.W.3d 446
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pierce v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 548 S.W.3d 923 →
Opinion
Jermaine Pierce appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierce v. State, 553 S.W.3d 446 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
553 S.W.3d 446 (Pierce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.