Pierce v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pierce v. State

396 So. 2d 858, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19201

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 14, 1981

DocketNo. 80-49

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 396 So. 2d 858 (Pierce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pierce v. State, 396 So. 2d 858, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19201 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized from defendant’s motel room because the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that defendant had vacated the premises and that the landlord’s consent to search removed the requirement that a search warrant be obtained. Furthermore, the issue raised on appeal following defendant’s plea of no contest does not appear to be dispositive. Brown v. State, 355 So.2d 138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), approved, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla.1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized from defendant’s motel room because the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that defendant had vacated the premises and that the landlord’s consent to search removed the requirement that a search warrant be obtained. Furthermore, the issue raised on appeal following defendant’s plea of no contest does not appear to be dispositive. Brown v. State, 355 So.2d 138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), approved, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla.1979).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

396 So. 2d 858, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack