Pierce v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pierce v. State

260 So. 2d 884, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7034

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 1972·No. No. P-390·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Yost v. State, 243 So.2d 469 (Fla.App.1971) and Johnson v. State, Fla.App., 260 So.2d 212, opinion i filed March 23, 1972.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Yost v. State, 243 So.2d 469 (Fla.App.1971) and Johnson v. State, Fla.App., 260 So.2d 212, opinion i filed March 23, 1972.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ-, concur.

Pierce v. State, 260 So. 2d 884, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7034 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

260 So. 2d 884 (Pierce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related